The group of prosecutors within the case Lava Jato introduced this Monday a brand new criticism towards the previous president of Brazil Lula da Silva (2003-2011), this time for an alleged crime of cash laundering, two weeks after the Justice of the nation unanimously annulled one other of the complaints that weighed towards the chief of the Workers Party (PT).
On this event, prosecutors have argued that, by way of its founding, Lula between December 2013 and March 2014 could have acquired irregular donations price 4 million reais (about 640,000 euros) from the large Odebrecht, to the detriment of the state oil firm Petrobras.
In addition to the previous Brazilian president, the previous Minister of Finance has additionally been denounced, Antonio Palocci, and the president of the Lula Institute, Paulo Okamotto.
The particular group of prosecutors has defined that though these transfers have been carried out in a authorized method at first, the quantities have been deducted from the bribes that Odebrecht paid to win a sequence of public contracts, in line with the chain ‘Globo’.
According to those investigations, it was Lula and Okamotto themselves who requested the Brazilian building firm who would use the previous president’s basis to “disguise” these unlawful fundsFor this purpose, they request that each be sentenced to return these 4 million reais, in addition to to restore the ethical and financial harm that they’d have triggered to the State.
Waiting for the Justice to evaluate the proof offered by the Prosecutor and rule on whether or not or to not provoke a brand new case towards Lula, this would be the fourth that the previous Brazilian president faces within the courts of the state of Paran, in southern Brazil.
In two of them, Lula was convicted of the ‘Triplex’ case, associated to his condo in Atibaia, a municipality within the state of Sao Paulo, whose works have been carried out by Odebrecht and OAS in change for favoring these two firms in future contracts with state-owned Petrobras.
For these expenses, he was sentenced in November 2019 to 17 years in jail, though he solely served 600 days. In May, a federal court docket dismissed the attraction filed by the previous president to annul this sentence.
The third criticism, for which he has not but been tried, is said to the irregularities that have been allegedly dedicated within the tender for land for the development of the Lula Institute headquarters and within the buy of an condo in Sao Paulo.
On this event, Lula’s lawyer, Cristiano Zanin, has criticized that the ‘Lava Jato’ group “returns to resort to immaterial accusations towards its opponents”, at a time, he recalled, during which “the illegality of its strategies “with the previous president” has lately been acknowledged in a minimum of three trials carried out by the Federal Supreme Court. ”